Associated Primes II


Today we’ll continue towards a primary decomposition for modules. First, I’ll list two facts without proof that may come up (they are quite straightforward to prove if you want to try). If R is any ring and 0\to M'\to M\to M''\to 0 is an exact sequence of R-modules, then Ass(M)\subset Ass(M')\cup Ass(M''). Secondly, if R is a Noetherian ring and M a non-zero finite R-module, then there is a chain 0=M_0\subset M_1\subset \cdots \subset M_n=M of submodules of M such that for each i we have M_i/M_{i-1}\simeq R/P_i with P_i\in Spec R.

I don’t remember, but I may have even proved that second one when talking about Artin-Rees. Now let R be Noetherian and M a finite R-module.

I) Ass(M) is finite. We induct on the length of the chain in the second fact. Suppose this is true for all M having a chain of the above form of length n-1. If N is a finite module with a chain of length n, then since R is Noetherian and N_{n-1} is a submodule it is also finite. So by the inductive hypothesis, Ass(N_{n-1}) is finite. Now consider the exact sequence 0\to N_{n-1} \to N \to N/N_{n-1}\to 0. By the first fact Ass(N)\subset Ass(N_{n-1})\cup Ass(N/N_{n-1}). But the chain has the condition that N/N_{n-1}\simeq R/P for some P\in Spec(R). Since Ass(R/P)=\{P\} we have that the cardinality of Ass(N) can increase by at most one from the cardinality of Ass(N_{n-1}) which was finite.

II) Ass(M)\subset Supp(M). Suppose P\in Ass(M). Then M contains a submodule isomorphic to R/P (it is just the image of the hom r\mapsto r\cdot x and apply first iso theorem). So 0\to R/P\to M is exact, so when we localize we still have an exact sequence 0\to R_P/PR_P\to M_P. Since R_P/PR_P\neq 0, M_P\neq 0 which means P\in Supp(M).

III) The set of minimal elements of Ass(M) coincides with the minimal elements of Supp(M). Well, (II) gave one inclusion so suppose P\in Supp(M) is a minimal element. Then since M_P\neq 0 by the last post we get that Ass(M_P)\neq \emptyset. But we also figured out a formula for this set Ass(M_P)=Ass(M)\cap Spec(R_P)\subset Supp(M)\cap Spec(R_P)=\{P\}. Thus by non-emptyness we must have P\in Ass(M).

Recall when we working in the Zariski topology on Spec(R). We have an operator on ideals V(I)=\{p\in Spec(R) : p\subset I\}, and the Zariski closed sets of Spec(R) are precisely those sets that are of the form V(I) for some I.

So by definition of this operator, if P_1, \ldots , P_r are the minimal elements of Supp(M), then Supp(M)=V(P_1)\cup \cdots \cup V(P_r). Another property of the topological space Spec(R) is that a subspace is irreducible if and only if it is V(\frak{p}) for some minimal prime \frak{p}. So if we think of Supp(M) as a closed subspace of Spec(R), then the irreducible components are precisely V(P_i). We call the P_i the isolated associated primes of M. The other associated primes are called embedded primes.

Due to the above geomtric interpretation of what isolated and embedded primes are, the terms make sense. An isolated prime gives you full irreducible component of Supp(M) whereas an embedded prime gives some embedded subspace of the component generated by the prime it lies over.

I’ll finish with the new definitions. Suppose N\subset M is a submodule. Then we call N a primary submodule if for all r\in R and x\in M we have the condition x\notin N and rx\in N\Rightarrow r^nM\subset N for some n.

The above condition is equivalent to the condition: if r\in R is a zero-divisor for M/N, then r\in \sqrt{(ann(M/N)}. Showing these are equivalent is immediate when you write out what the definitions of all these things are. This shows that the property of being primary is dependent only on the quotient module M/N.

Sorry to end on some definitions, but I think if I do another theorem this post will become too long.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s