Notice from last time that the matrix exponential maps from the Lie algebra to the Lie group. It took an arbitrary matrix (i.e. a tangent vector at the identity) and mapped it to a non-singular matrix (i.e. a matrix in ). Now we want a map
that does the same basic idea. Let’s unravel what that idea was.
It was sort of hidden, but we said that the one-parameter subgroup of generated by A, is
. So it took a line through the origin:
, and sent it to a one-parameter subgroup
.
Let’s sort of work backwards. We have a one-parameter subgroup generated by , say
from the last post (the integral curve starting at the identity). From our matrix example, we also saw that if we flowed along this for 1 time unit,
. Thus we’ll define
, where
is the one-parameter subgroup generated by
. Thus
will be mapping from the Lie algebra to the Lie group.
Now we need to check the line through the origin property. i.e. Is the one-parameter subgroup generated by
? Well, it is really a simple matter of rescaling. Let
by rescaling. Then
is the integral curve of
starting at
, so
.
Now there are lots of properties we should check. I’ll go through a few this time and the rest tomorrow before moving on. First off, we hope that is a smooth map. In other words, in terms of the flow, we need
to depend smoothly on
.
Define a vector field on by
. Note we made the natural identification
. Let
be a basis for
and
the coordinates for
,
. Also, let
be smooth coordinates for
.
Let . Then in coordinates
. Each
is a derivative in the
direction, so the expression depends smoothly on
. Hence
is a smooth vector field.
Now the flow of , say
, is
. Now the fact that
is a flow of a smooth map shows that it is smooth. Let
be projection. Then
and hence is a composition of smooth maps so is itself smooth.
That was sort of exhausting, so I’ll just do one quick other property before quitting: . This is just because
is a one-parameter subgroup and hence homomorphism. The group structure on
is additive and the Lie group operation is multiplicative:
.
Alright, one more quick one, since that one shouldn’t count. This one is a big one, in that it corresponds with a very characteristic property of the complex valued exponential. If we identify and
with
, then
is the identity map!
Let . Then
. Thus
(the equality comes from the fact that exp is the flow).
I guess this ran a bit long. Oh well, time is running out.
Pingback: Analytic Theory of Abelian Varieties I « A Mind for Madness