I realized there was one more result I probably should have included last time. Oh well. Here goes:
Let be integral,
a prime ideal in R and
prime ideals in
lying over
. If
, then
.
Proof: Recall that is integral over
by last time for any multiplicative set, and also that prime ideals are preserved in rings of fractions. Thus the hypotheses still hold if we localize at
. Thus
is integral over
, and
are prime ideals. Thus we can WLOG replace
and
by their localizations and hence assume they are local. So now
is a maximal ideal in
. Thus by last time
is maximal. Since
, we have
.
Now we are ready for the two big theorems. Here is the “Lying Over” Theorem. Let be an integral extension. If
is a prime ideal in R, then there is a prime ideal
in
lying over
, i.e.
.
Proof: First note that and
form the two sides of a commutative diagram. By last time
is integral over
. Choose a maximal ideal
in
. Thus
is maximal in
. But
is local with unique max ideal
, so
. But the preimage of a prime ideal is prime, so
is a prime ideal in
.
Now we just diagram chase: . And also:
.
Thus lies over
.
Our other big theorem is the one about “Going Up”: If is an integral extension and
are prime in R, and
lies over
, then there is a prime ideal
lying over
with
.
Proof: By last time is an integral extension where
is embedded in
as
. Now we just replace
and R by these rings so that both
and
are
. Now we just apply the Lying Over Theorem to get our result.
So as we see here integral extensions behave extremely nicely. These theorems guarantee that se always have prime ideals lying over ones in the lower field. This has some important applications to the Krull dimension that we’ll start looking at next time.
Pingback: e, f, and the remainder theorem « Delta Epsilons